Why the study?
Does nisoldipine added to beta-blockers improve exercise capacity and reduce anginal attacks in patients with chronic stable angina?
Does nisoldipine added to beta-blockers improve exercise capacity and reduce anginal attacks in patients with chronic stable angina?
Adding nisoldipine 10 mg daily to beta-blocker therapy improves exercise capacity and reduces anginal attacks in patients with chronic stable angina.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adding nisoldipine to beta-blockers for chronic stable angina; reinforces dihydropyridine CCB combination therapy in RCTs.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed to assess whether a new calcium antagonist, nisoldipine, in doses of either 5 mg or 10 mg daily, in combination with beta-adrenergic-blocking drugs (combination therapy) was more effective than beta-adrenergic-blocking drugs alone (single therapy) in the treatment of chronic stable angina. Treatments were assessed at two-week intervals, using exercise electrocardiography and patients' anginal diaries. A significant improvement in exercise capacity and reduction in anginal attacks occurred only during nisoldipine (10 mg daily) combination therapy compared with single therapy. Mean exercise time increased from 419 +/- 146 s (single) to 454 +/- 158 s (p less than 0.02) after combination therapy. Exercise time to onset of 1 mm ST-segment depression improved from 326 +/- 145 s (single) to 331 +/- 139 s after combination therapy, although the change was not significant. Mean number of anginal attacks decreased from 21 +/- 22 (single to 15 +/- 19 (p less than 0.01) during combination treatment, with an associated significant reduction in glyceryl trinitrate consumption. Adverse effects during combined therapy were minor and tolerable. Thus patients limited by exertional angina despite beta-adrenergic-blocking drugs may obtain supplemental relief of angina and myocardial ischemia with the addition of nisoldipine in a dose of 10 mg daily.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Keefe et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: