Why the study?
Does sex influence the development of sodium-sensitive renal-wrap hypertension in rats?
Does sex influence the development of sodium-sensitive renal-wrap hypertension in rats?
Female rats are protected against one-kidney, figure-8 renal-wrap hypertension and are less sensitive to the effects of sodium compared to males.
Does not support sex-specific hypertension management; leaves open translation of female protection against salt-sensitive renal-wrap hypertension to humans.
One-kidney, figure-8 renal wrap or sham operation was performed on male and female rats to determine if a difference existed in the expression of hypertension between the sexes. Animals were prepared with radiotelemetry transmitters to monitor mean arterial pressure and heart rate continuously throughout an 8-week study. Dietary sodium content was changed during the post-renal-wrap period from normal (100 micromol/g chow) to high (2000 micromol/g chow) to low (<2 micromol/g chow) to assess sodium sensitivity. Both male and female rats experienced an increase in arterial pressure after the renal-wrap procedure; however, the hypertension was significantly attenuated in the females. High salt caused a further increase in both groups of rats that was again attenuated in the female rats. Low sodium diet reduced arterial pressure in all groups of rats. Heart rate was significantly elevated in the female rats during all dietary interventions. The data were fit to a cosine function to analyze circadian rhythm changes. An increase in the light/dark difference for arterial pressure in the hypertensive rats during high salt diet resulted in an increase in the circadian amplitude (range of the rhythm). In the normotensive rats fed a high salt diet, the arterial pressure acrophase (peak of rhythm) was delayed while the heart rate acrophase was shifted to an earlier time. These studies showed that female rats are protected against one-kidney, figure-8 renal-wrap hypertension and are less sensitive to the effects of sodium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haywood et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: