Why the study?
Do C-reactive protein gene haplotypes affect the risk of coronary heart disease in men and women aged 55 years and older?
Do C-reactive protein gene haplotypes affect the risk of coronary heart disease in men and women aged 55 years and older?
Although elevated CRP levels are associated with increased CHD risk, common genetic variation in the CRP gene does not significantly affect CHD occurrence, suggesting CRP may be a risk marker rather than a causal factor.
CRP marks CHD risk without haplotype support for causality; leaves open whether CRP is causal and should not yet change practice.
AIMS: C-reactive protein is associated with risk of cardiovascular disease. However, whether C-reactive protein is a marker of severity of cardiovascular disease or actually is involved in its pathogenesis remains unknown. We investigated the relation between C-reactive protein haplotypes, representing the comprehensive variation of the C-reactive protein gene, and coronary heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Rotterdam Study is a prospective population-based study among men and women aged 55 years and older. C-reactive protein was associated with risk of coronary heart disease, with a multivariable adjusted hazard ratio of 1.9 (95% CI 1.5-2.4) for the highest vs. the lowest quartile. Four C-reactive protein haplotypes were present with overall frequencies of 32.8, 31.7, 29.5, and 5.9%. C-reactive protein serum levels were significantly different according to C-reactive protein haplotypes. C-reactive protein haplotypes were not associated with coronary heart disease. CONCLUSION: Steady-state C-reactive protein serum level is influenced by C-reactive protein gene haplotypes. Although elevated C-reactive protein level has lately been found to be a consistent and relatively strong risk factor for cardiovascular disease, our study does not support that the common variation in the C-reactive protein gene has a large effect on the occurrence of coronary heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kardys et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: