Why the study?
Does preoperative multimodality imaging improve patient selection for aortic valve repair in patients with aortic regurgitation and/or aortopathy?
Does preoperative multimodality imaging improve patient selection for aortic valve repair in patients with aortic regurgitation and/or aortopathy?
Preoperative multimodality imaging techniques may improve patient selection for aortic valve repair by assessing the mechanism of aortic regurgitation, valve morphology, calcification, and aortic root dimensions.
May support multimodality imaging for AR repair selection; leaves open prospective outcome trials.
Aortic valve sparing surgery for aortic regurgitation and/or aortopathy serves as an alternative to aortic valve and root replacement. One of the advantages of aortic valve sparing surgery over conventional replacement is that there is no need for life-long anticoagulation, which is particularly attractive in young patients who may receive a mechanical prosthesis otherwise. However, successful aortic valve repair requires high expertise. At present, reparability is determined intraoperatively by direct surgical inspection. Preoperative imaging techniques might improve the patient selection for aortic valve repair. The mechanism of aortic regurgitation, aortic valve morphology and calcification and aortic root dimensions are all of importance when aortic valve repair is considered. The present review focuses on the role of imaging techniques in determining aortic valve reparability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Regeer et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: