Why the study?
Does exposure to antiplatelet and antifibrinolytic drugs influence the risk of re-exploration due to bleeding in patients undergoing primary CABG?
Does exposure to antiplatelet and antifibrinolytic drugs influence the risk of re-exploration due to bleeding in patients undergoing primary CABG?
Clopidogrel use is a major risk factor for bleeding requiring re-exploration after primary CABG, whereas aprotinin provides a protective effect.
Clopidogrel exposure was associated with higher re-exploration risk after CABG; leaves open whether aprotinin use warrants re-evaluation in randomized trials.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate relevant clinical risk factors for re-exploration due to bleeding after primary coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, and to evaluate the influence of antiplatelet and antifibrinolytic drugs. DESIGN: Three retrospective analyses were performed on patients who underwent CABG: (1) Logistic regression was used to identify clinical risk factors for re-exploration (n = 3000). (2) A case-control study (n = 228) was used to obtain information on exposure of antithrombotic and hemostatic therapy. (3) Based on exposure to antiplatelet and antifibrinolytic therapy, and odds ratios (ORs) in multivariate logistic models, the proportion of re-explorations attributed to these drugs was calculated. RESULTS: A receiver operating characteristic curve was created for clinical risk factors. The C-index was 0.64, indicating limited ability to predict re-exploration for bleeding. Clopidogrel was the only drug influencing the risk of re-exploration (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.7-5.9). The harmful effect of clopidogrel was confirmed in multivariate model (OR 4.7, 95% CI 2.2-9.9), and aprotinin had a protective effect of the same magnitude (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel is an essential risk factor for re-exploration due to bleeding, and attributable to at least one-quarter of surveyed cases. Aside from pharmaceuticals, there are no strong clinical risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alström et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: