Why the study?
Can simpler methods using the radial artery waveform accurately estimate central aortic systolic and pulse pressure compared to the SphygmoCor process?
Population
Two sets of data with radial artery pressure waves measured by applanation tonometry
Comparison
Three simpler methods to generate central… vs SphygmoCor process
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
Simplifies bedside central pressure estimation; leaves open outcome validation in broader cohorts.
Can simpler methods using the radial artery waveform accurately estimate central aortic systolic and pulse pressure compared to the SphygmoCor process?
Simple inspection of the radial waveform can accurately estimate central aortic systolic and pulse pressure, offering a simpler alternative to the SphygmoCor system.
Adji et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: