Why the study?
In-stent restenosis remains a significant problem affecting long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in coronary artery disease patients.
What is the incidence and what are the influencing factors of in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary artery disease?
What is the incidence and what are the influencing factors of in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary artery disease?
The incidence of in-stent restenosis after PCI remains high at 23%, driven by factors such as bare-metal stent use, multiple stents, diabetes, and complex lesions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meta-analysis pools ISR incidence and factors post-PCI; leaves open targeted prevention strategies pending prospective validation.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a commonly used treatment for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), yet in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a significant problem affecting long-term outcomes. This study systematically determined the incidence of ISR and its influencing factors in CAD patients after PCI using a meta-analytical approach. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL for relevant articles published up to August 2024. Meta-analysis was performed using R Studio to estimate the pooled effect sizes for both incidence and influencing factors. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² and Q tests, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test. A total of 42 studies were included, involving 31,884 patients and 16 potential influencing factors. The meta-analysis showed that the overall estimated incidence of ISR after PCI in CAD patients was 23% (95% CI: 20%-27%, p < 0.001). The following factors were identified as significant risk factors for ISR: longer lesion length (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.04-1.11), use of bare-metal stents (OR = 3.29, 95% CI: 2.30-4.71), longer stent length (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.11-1.35), greater number of stents (OR = 3.51, 95% CI: 2.34-5.26), diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.37-1.85), complex lesions (type B2/C) (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.22-1.70), restenotic lesions (OR = 3.71, 95% CI: 2.56-5.37), bifurcation lesions (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.43-3.53), smoking (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.17-1.89), high red cell distribution width (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.15-2.42), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.03-4.89). In contrast, larger reference vessel diameter (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.46-0.67) and larger minimal lumen diameter (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.47-0.63) were associated with a lower risk of ISR. However, sex (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 0.68-3.63), pre-interventional stenosis degree (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.99-1.43), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.98-1.06) did not significantly affect ISR after PCI. The incidence of ISR after PCI in CAD patients is high. Longer lesion length, the use of bare-metal stents, longer stent length, a greater number of stents, diabetes, lesion type B2/C, the presence of restenotic lesions and bifurcation lesions, smoking, high red cell distribution width, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein increase the risk of ISR after PCI in CAD patients. In contrast, larger reference vessel diameter and larger minimal lumen diameter may reduce the risk of ISR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: