Key result
Low HDL-C linked to ~57% higher coronary heart disease risk.
Why the study?
Isolated low HDL-C is a novel dyslipidemic profile that may be especially prevalent in Asian populations and associated with increased coronary heart disease risk.
Does isolated low HDL-C increase the risk of coronary heart disease or stroke in the Asia-Pacific population?
Meta-Analysis (n=220,060)
Yes
Does isolated low HDL-C increase the risk of coronary heart disease or stroke in the Asia-Pacific population?
Hazard Ratio: 1.57 (95% CI 1.31–1.87)
Isolated low HDL-C is a prevalent lipid phenotype in Asian populations that independently increases the risk of coronary heart disease.
May inform CHD risk stratification in Asians; extends observational data but leaves causal effects and practice change open.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that there is a novel dyslipidemic profile consisting of isolated low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level that is associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease, and that this trait may be especially prevalent in Asian populations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Individual participant data from 220 060 participants (87% Asian) in 37 studies from the Asia-Pacific region were included. Low HDL-C (HDL <1.03 mmol/L in men and <1.30 mmol/L in women) was seen among 33.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.9-33.3) of Asians versus 27.0% (95% CI, 26.5-27.5) of non-Asians (P<0.001). The prevalence of low HDL-C in the absence of other lipid abnormalities (isolated low HDL-C) was higher in Asians compared with non-Asians: 22.4% (95% CI, 22.2-22.5) versus 14.5% (95% CI, 14.1-14.9), respectively (P<0.001). During 6.8 years of follow-up, there were 574 coronary heart disease and 739 stroke events. There was an inverse relationship between low HDL-C with coronary heart disease in all individuals (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.31-1.87). In Asians, isolated low levels of HDL-C were as strongly associated with coronary heart disease risk as low levels of HDL-C combined with other lipid abnormalities (hazard ratio, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.27-2.19] versus 1.63 [95% CI, 1.24-2.15], respectively). There was no association between low HDL-C and stroke risk in this population (hazard ratio, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.78 to 1.17] with nonisolated low HDL-C and 0.81 [95% CI, 0.67-1.00] with isolated low HDL-C). CONCLUSION: Isolated low HDL-C is a novel lipid phenotype that appears to be more prevalent among Asian populations, in whom it is associated with increased coronary risk. Further investigation into this type of dyslipidemia is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huxley et al. (2011) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary Heart Disease (n=220,060). Low HDL-C vs. Normal HDL-C was evaluated on Coronary heart disease (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.31-1.87). Low HDL-C was associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.31-1.87), with isolated low HDL-C conferring a similar risk increase in Asian populations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: