Why the study?
Does anti-TNF therapy improve clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Does anti-TNF therapy improve clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
While TNF-alpha antagonists are effective in rheumatoid arthritis, large clinical trials have failed to show significant clinical benefit in chronic heart failure.
Anti-TNF therapy lacks benefit in chronic HF; confirms RECOVER/RENAISSANCE failures and leaves open other inflammatory targets.
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha has been thoroughly investigated and established as a pivotal component of the inflammatory cascade. This review encompasses the safety and efficacy of TNF antagonists in rheumatoid arthritis, the interplay between rheumatoid arthritis and heart failure, as well as presentation of the available preclinical and clinical data discussing the use of anti-TNF therapy in patients with chronic heart failure. There is well-documented evidence for the role of anti-TNF-alpha in rheumatoid arthritis, in contrast to the controversial role of anti-TNF-alpha in heart failure. In animal models and small-scale clinical trials, anti-TNF therapy showed some promise in treating chronic heart failure, whereas larger, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials (i.e., RECOVER [Research into Etanercept Cytokine Antagonism in Ventricular Dysfunction] and RENAISSANCE [Randomized Etanercept North American Strategy to Study Antagonism of Cytokines]) failed to show a statistically significant difference in composite clinical function score for anti-TNF therapy versus placebo. Future investigation is needed to determine if individualized dosing of anti-TNF therapy is necessary and whether or not treating patients with earlier-stage disease will show a benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mousa et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: