Why the study?
Does vagal stimulation decrease left ventricular contractility independently of its negative chronotropic effect in a rabbit model?
Does vagal stimulation decrease left ventricular contractility independently of its negative chronotropic effect in a rabbit model?
Vagal stimulation decreases left ventricular contractility primarily through its heart rate-lowering effect rather than a direct negative inotropic mechanism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No evidence for direct vagal inotropy independent of rate in rabbits; hypothesis-generating for human autonomic modulation of contractility.
Although an increase in vagal tone is known to slow heart rate (HR), whether it also depresses left ventricular contractility through mechanisms independent of the bradycardic effect remains unknown. The chief aim of this investigation, therefore, was the separation of the observed vagally mediated depression of ventricular contractility into direct and indirect vagal effects, the latter resulting via negative chronotropism. In 12 anesthetized, sympathectomized open-chest rabbits, we measured left ventricular contractility through determination of the end-systolic elastance (Ees). We found that tonic vagal stimulation administered at 0, 5, and 10 Hz decreased both HR (226.9 +/- 39.7, 201.9 +/- 25.7, and 171.3 +/- 18.5 beats/min, respectively; P = 0.0003) and Ees (109.5 +/- 25.7, 85.1 +/- 34.1, and 71.9 +/- 33.1 mmHg/ml, respectively; P = 5 x 10(-6)) in a frequency-dependent fashion. However, we observed that as long as HR was kept constant through fixed-rate atrial pacing, vagal stimulation resulted in little or no change in Ees. Thus we conclude that the negative inotropic effect of vagal stimulation is attributable primarily to its negative chronotropic effect when sympathetic tone is minimal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsuura et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: