Key result
Survival in patients with anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy after CF-LVAD implantation was similar to those with idiopathic dilated (aHR 1.12; 95% CI 0.88-1.43) or ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
Improved cancer survivorship has increased anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy patients with end-stage heart failure, but whether outcomes after continuous-flow LVAD implantation are comparable to other cardiomyopathy aetiologies remains to be evaluated.
Cohort
Yes
Hazard Ratio: 1.12 (95% CI 0.88–1.43)
Absolute Event Rate: 85.1% vs 86%
Supports CF-LVAD consideration in anthracycline cardiomyopathy; extends registry data but leaves open need for prospective validation.
AIMS: Improved cancer survivorship has led to a higher number of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy patients with end-stage heart failure. We hypothesize that outcomes following continuous-flow LVAD (CF-LVAD) implantation in those with anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy are comparable with other aetiologies of cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) from 2008 to 2017, we identified patients with anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy who received a CF-LVAD and compared them with those with idiopathic dilated (IDM) and ischaemic cardiomyopathies (ICM). Mortality was studied using the Cox proportional hazards model. Other adverse events were evaluated using competing risk models. Overall, 248 anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy patients underwent CF-LVAD implantation, with a median survival of 48 months, an improvement compared with those before 2012 [adjusted hazards ratio (aHR): 0.53; confidence interval (CI): 0.33-0.86]. At 12 months, 85.1% of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy, 86.0% of IDM, and 80.2% of ICM patients were alive (anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy vs. IDM: aHR: 1.12; CI: 0.88-1.43 and anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy vs. ICM: aHR: 0.98; CI: 0.76-1.28). Anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy patients had a higher major bleeding risk compared with IDM patients (aHR: 1.23; CI: 1.01-1.50), and a lower risk of stroke and prolonged respiratory support compared to ICM patients (aHR: 0.31 and 0.67 respectively; both P < 0.05). There was no difference in the risk of major infection, acute kidney injury, and venous thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: After receiving a CF-LVAD, survival in patients with anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy is similar to those with ICM or IDM. Further research into differential secondary endpoints-related disparities is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guha et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy with end-stage heart failure. Anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy vs. Idiopathic dilated (IDM) and ischaemic cardiomyopathies (ICM) was evaluated on Survival at 12 months (aHR 1.12, 95% CI 0.88-1.43). Survival in patients with anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy after CF-LVAD implantation was similar to those with idiopathic dilated (aHR 1.12; 95% CI 0.88-1.43) or ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: