Why the study?
Does assessed hypertension compared to alleged hypertension relate to differences in survival, cognition, and symptoms in 80-year-olds?
Does assessed hypertension compared to alleged hypertension relate to differences in survival, cognition, and symptoms in 80-year-olds?
In an 80-year-old cohort, individuals with hypertension assessed in the clinic demonstrated better survival and cognition compared to those with a known history of hypertension.
Assessed hypertension was associated with better survival in octogenarians; leaves open whether clinic assessment refines prognosis or reflects selection bias.
OBJECTIVES: To relate elevated blood pressure in 80-year-olds to symptoms, life satisfaction and survival. DESIGN: Examinations of medical, psychological and social factors every year between 80 and 86 years of age. SETTING: Primary health care in the city of Lund in southern Sweden. SUBJECTS: Three-hundred and thirty-three persons living in the city of Lund and born in 1908. Participation rate was 67%. INTERVENTION: Abnormal findings were further examined and treated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptoms, blood pressure, laboratory values, psychological factors, cognition, living conditions, and survival. RESULTS: Hypertension according to the definition used was found in 70%. Women were over-represented (P < 0.05). Amongst persons with alleged hypertension, diuretics (P < 0.001) and 'other cardiovascular drugs' (P < 0.001) were more often used. Analgesics were more often used amongst assessed hypertensives (P < 0.05). Those with assessed hypertension scored better in testing of cognition compared to nonhypertensives (P < 0.05), and less often lived in institutions (P < 0.001). Assessed hypertensives had a better survival than alleged hypertensives during the following 7 years (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Eighty-year-olds with assessed hypertension in the consulting room showed fewer symptoms and had a better cognition and survival than alleged hypertensives (those with a history of hypertension).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: