Key result
Myocardial salvage index assessed by CMR independently predicted major adverse cardiovascular events in reperfused STEMI patients (HR 0.963) and significantly improved the prognostic performance of the GRACE risk score.
Why the study?
This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of CMR-assessed myocardial salvage index in reperfused STEMI and investigate whether it improves the predictive efficacy of the GRACE risk score.
Does myocardial salvage index (MSI) assessed by CMR predict MACE in patients with reperfused STEMI?
Cohort (n=104)
No
Does myocardial salvage index (MSI) assessed by CMR predict MACE in patients with reperfused STEMI?
Hazard Ratio: 0.963 (95% CI 0.943–0.983)
Absolute Event Rate: 30.8% vs 9.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Myocardial salvage index assessed by CMR provides independent prognostic value for long-term MACE in reperfused STEMI patients and improves the predictive accuracy of the GRACE risk score.
MSI by CMR may refine STEMI risk stratification beyond GRACE; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Aims Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a powerful tool to quantify the myocardial area at risk (AAR) and infarct size (IS), and evaluate the extent of myocardial salvage in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of myocardial salvage index (MSI) assessed by CMR in reperfused STEMI and investigate whether MSI could improve the predictive efficacy of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score. Methods and results: About 104 consecutive patients who were hospitalized with first-time STEMI and received reperfusion therapy were prospectively enrolled. The primary endpoint was the incident of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) including all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial reinfarction and congestive heart failure within 36 months after the index event. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic association of MSI with MACE risk. About 21 (20.2%) patients developed MACE during the 3-year follow-up period, and patients with MSI < median had a higher incidence of MACE than those with MSI ≥ median [16 (30.8%) vs. 5 (9.6%), P = 0.007]. After adjusting all the parameters associated with MACE in univariate Cox analysis, MSI assessed by CMR remained independently significant as a predictor of MACE in multivariate Cox analysis (hazard ratio 0.963, 95% CI: 0.943–0.983; P < 0.001). Adding MSI to the GRACE risk score significantly increased the prognostic accuracy of the GRACE risk score (area under the curve: 0.833 vs. 0.773; P = 0.044), with a net reclassification improvement of 0.635 ( P = 0.009) and an integrated discrimination improvement of 0.101 ( P = 0.002). Conclusion This study confirmed that MSI assessed by CMR had a good long-term prognostic value in reperfused STEMI and improve the prognostic performance of the GRACE risk score.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=104). Myocardial salvage index (MSI) assessed by CMR vs. Higher vs lower MSI (median split or continuous) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) including all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial reinfarction, and congestive heart failure (HR 0.963, 95% CI 0.943-0.983, p=<0.001). Myocardial salvage index assessed by CMR independently predicted major adverse cardiovascular events in reperfused STEMI patients (HR 0.963) and significantly improved the prognostic performance of the GRACE risk score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: