Key result
Greater marital distress was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of meeting criteria for metabolic syndrome in women, but not in men.
Why the study?
Does marital distress increase the likelihood of metabolic syndrome in older adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,342)
Does marital distress increase the likelihood of metabolic syndrome in older adults?
Marital distress is associated with an increased likelihood of metabolic syndrome in older women, highlighting a sex-specific psychosocial risk factor for cardiovascular disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support screening for marital distress in metabolic syndrome care; hypothesis-generating for sex-specific links pending longitudinal data.
Mechanisms by which poor relationship functioning contributes to poor health are not fully understood. We conducted a study to evaluate the association between marital distress and the metabolic syndrome (MetS), which refers to a clustering of characteristics that have individually been shown to be associated with elevated risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes and which collectively have been shown to increase risk for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, stroke, and mortality. A population-based English sample of couples (N = 671 couples) in which both partners were between the ages of 52 and 79 years old completed a self-report measure of marital distress and a nurse visit that included collection of blood pressure, blood samples, and anthropometric measures. Results indicated that for women, after controlling for demographic variables, greater marital distress was significantly associated with increasing likelihood of meeting criteria for the MetS and with the individual MetS criteria of elevated blood pressure and elevated fasting glucose. The association between marital distress and the MetS remained significant for women when additionally controlling for depressive symptoms and health habits (smoking status, physical activity). Marital distress was not significantly associated with the MetS or any of the individual MetS criteria for men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whisman et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic syndrome (n=1,342). Marital distress vs. Lower or no marital distress was evaluated on Meeting criteria for the metabolic syndrome (MetS). Greater marital distress was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of meeting criteria for metabolic syndrome in women, but not in men.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: