Demonstrates that MMP-2 inhibition protects against cell death and contractile dysfunction in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion by preserving IRE1α, indicating a novel cardioprotective mechanism.
Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is one of the major events accompanying myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury, as hypoxia and oxidative stress disrupt protein folding in the ER. As a result, the unfolded protein response (UPR) is activated through different sensors including inositol-requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α) and protein kinase R-like ER kinase (PERK). Failure of the UPR to reduce ER stress induces cellular dysfunction. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) is a ubiquitous protease that is activated intracellularly in response to oxidative stress and partially localizes near the ER. However, its role in ER homeostasis is unknown. We hypothesized that MMP-2 is involved in the regulation of the UPR and ER stress-mediated apoptosis during IR injury. Isolated mouse hearts subjected to IR injury showed impaired recovery of post-ischemic contractile function compared to aerobically perfused controls. Ventricular extracts from IR hearts had higher levels of glucose-regulated protein-78 and protein disulfide isomerase and lower levels of IRE1α and PERK compared to aerobic controls. MMP-2 inhibitors, ARP-100 or ONO-4817, given 10 min before ischemia, improved cardiac post-ischemic recovery and preserved IRE1α level in hearts subjected to 30 min ischemia/40 min reperfusion. IR also increased the levels of CHOP and mitochondrial Bax and caspase-3 and -9 activities, indicating induction of apoptosis, all of which were attenuated by MMP-2 inhibitors, regardless of the reperfusion time. Immunoprecipitation showed an association between MMP-2 and IRE1α in aerobic and IR hearts. During myocardial IR injury MMP-2 may impair the UPR and induce apoptosis by proteolysis of IRE1α. Inhibition of MMP-2 activity protects against cardiac contractile dysfunction in part by preserving IRE1α and preventing the progression to myocardial cell death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bassiouni et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: