Key result
Atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke was associated with a higher risk of 1-year ischemic stroke recurrence compared to sinus rhythm (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.29-2.01), but similar to known AF.
Why the study?
The study aimed to compare the risk of 1-year ischemic stroke recurrence and death among patients with atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke, atrial fibrillation known before stroke, and sinus rhythm.
Does atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke (AFDAS) carry a similar risk of 1-year ischemic stroke recurrence and death compared to atrial fibrillation known before stroke (KAF) and sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Population
19 604 patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to 219 urban hospitals in China
Comparison
AF diagnosed after stroke vs AF known before stroke vs sinus rhythm
Design
Registry-based observational cohort study
Follow-up
1 year
Authors
Loading...
AFDAS may warrant anticoagulation vigilance similar to KAF; registry data leaves open whether detection timing modifies risk or practice.
Cohort (n=19,604)
Yes
Does atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke (AFDAS) carry a similar risk of 1-year ischemic stroke recurrence and death compared to atrial fibrillation known before stroke (KAF) and sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Hazard Ratio: 1.61 (95% CI 1.29–2.01)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.9% vs 5.7%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke carries a similar risk of 1-year ischemic stroke recurrence and mortality as atrial fibrillation known before stroke, highlighting the need for appropriate treatment in this population.
Yang et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in acute ischemic stroke (n=19,604). Atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke (AFDAS) vs. Sinus rhythm (SR) was evaluated on 1-year ischemic stroke recurrence (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.29-2.01, p=<0.0001). Atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke was associated with a higher risk of 1-year ischemic stroke recurrence compared to sinus rhythm (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.29-2.01), but similar to known AF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: