Key result
Atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke (AFDAS) was associated with a similar 1-year mortality rate compared to sinus rhythm (OR 1.839, p=0.257), whereas known atrial fibrillation independently predicted higher mortality.
Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke (AFDAS) is associated with lower stroke recurrence than known AF before stroke, but the characteristics and mortality rates of AFDAS patients required exploration.
Does atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke (AFDAS) increase mortality compared to known AF or sinus rhythm in acute ischemic stroke patients?
Population
134 consecutive ischemic stroke patients
Comparison
AFDAS vs known AF before stroke (KAF) vs sinus rhythm
Design
Cohort study
Follow-up
1 year
Authors
Loading...
AFDAS may warrant less intensive management than KAF post-stroke; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Cohort (n=134)
Does atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke (AFDAS) increase mortality compared to known AF or sinus rhythm in acute ischemic stroke patients?
Odds Ratio: 1.839 (95% CI 0.641–5.278)
Absolute Event Rate: 28.9% vs 16.2%
p-value: p=0.257
Atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke (AFDAS) appears to be a relatively benign form of AF with mortality rates similar to sinus rhythm, unlike known AF which independently predicts higher mortality.
İleri et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke (n=134). Atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke (AFDAS) vs. Sinus rhythm (SR) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (OR 1.839, 95% CI 0.641-5.278, p=0.257). Atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke (AFDAS) was associated with a similar 1-year mortality rate compared to sinus rhythm (OR 1.839, p=0.257), whereas known atrial fibrillation independently predicted higher mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: