Why the study?
Findings regarding the association between statin use and delirium risk have been inconsistent.
Does statin use reduce the incidence of delirium in critically ill and surgical patients?
Does statin use reduce the incidence of delirium in critically ill and surgical patients?
This meta-analysis demonstrates that statin use is not significantly associated with a reduced risk of delirium in critically ill and surgical patients, though high heterogeneity suggests further randomized trials are needed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Statin use shows no delirium risk reduction in critical/surgical patients; leaves open need for larger RCTs to confirm.
Purpose: Findings on the association of statin use with delirium risk are inconsistent. We performed an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate this association among critically ill and surgical patients. Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the EMBASE database, limiting the search to human patients and articles in English published until December 31, 2021. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to indicate the difference in the incidence of delirium between statin use and nonuse groups. A random-effects model was selected in the case of high heterogeneity of study populations. We used funnel plots, Egger’s test, Duval and Tweedie’s trim-and-fill approach, and the classic fail-safe N to assess publication bias. Findings: Of a total of 264 identified studies, 13 were selected for the qualitative review—4 RCTs and 9 observational cohort studies. Statin use was not associated with low delirium risk (pooled OR, 0·82; 95% CI, 0·64 to 1·04; p = 0·09). Substantial statistical heterogeneity was observed (I2, 90%). Visual inspection of the funnel plot of ORs from the studies revealed symmetry. Conclusions: Statin use is not associated with delirium risk. More comprehensive RCTs are required to confirm the results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: