Why the study?
Platelet activation after stenting long coronary segments is linked to periprocedural microvascular impairment and myonecrosis, but procedure-related microvascular changes and their link to platelet activation remained uncharacterized in long lesions treated with BVS versus EES.
Does everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) improve pressure-derived corrected index of microvascular resistance (cIMR) compared to everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in patients undergoing elective PCI in long lesions?
Does everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) improve pressure-derived corrected index of microvascular resistance (cIMR) compared to everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in patients undergoing elective PCI in long lesions?
In long lesions, BVS implantation is associated with a significant acute reduction in microvascular resistance compared with EES, without affecting platelet reactivity or periprocedural myonecrosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BVS may confer acute microvascular benefit versus EES in long lesions; leaves open clinical relevance pending larger trials.
AIMS: Significant platelet activation after long stented coronary segments has been associated with periprocedural microvascular impairment and myonecrosis. In long lesions treated either with an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) or an everolimus-eluting stent (EES), we aimed to investigate (a) procedure-related microvascular impairment, and (b) the relationship of platelet activation with microvascular function and related myonecrosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n=66) undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in long lesions were randomised 1:1 to either BVS or EES. The primary endpoint was the difference between groups in changes of pressure-derived corrected index of microvascular resistance (cIMR) after PCI. Periprocedural myonecrosis was assessed by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), platelet reactivity by high-sensitivity adenosine diphosphate (hs-ADP)-induced platelet reactivity with the Multiplate Analyzer. Post-dilatation was more frequent in the BVS group, with consequent longer procedure time. A significant difference was observed between the two groups in the primary endpoint of ΔcIMR (p=0.04). hs-ADP was not different between the groups at different time points. hs-cTnT significantly increased after PCI, without difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In long lesions, BVS implantation is associated with significant acute reduction in IMR as compared with EES, with no significant interaction with platelet reactivity or periprocedural myonecrosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pellicano et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: