Why the study?
Do statins reduce the progression of calcified aortic stenosis?
Do statins reduce the progression of calcified aortic stenosis?
Current evidence does not support the routine use of statins to delay the progression of calcified aortic stenosis due to conflicting results between retrospective and prospective trials.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support routine statin use to slow aortic stenosis progression; reinforces negative RCT over positive retrospective data.
OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence evaluating the efficacy of statins in reducing the progression of calcified aortic stenosis (AS). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched (all up to November 2006) for studies evaluating the use of statins to reduce the progression of calcified AS. Search terms included statin, HMG CoA reductase inhibitor, calcified AS, valve stenosis, and calcified stenosis. Additional primary trials were located by searching references noted in review articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Clinical trials published in the English language were selected for review. Primary efficacy outcomes evaluated were changes in aortic valve measurements, hemodynamic measures of AS, and change in measures of AS severity. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two prospective clinical trials and 5 retrospective studies were included in this review. All of the retrospective studies demonstrated that statin use was associated with a statistically significant delay in the progression of AS. One prospective observation trial showed benefit of statin use; however, a large, randomized, double-blind, prospective trial showed no benefit of statin use in decreasing the progression of AS. CONCLUSIONS: An association between statin use and a delay in AS progression has been observed in retrospective studies; however, prospective trials showed conflicting results. Currently, statins cannot be recommended for medical treatment of AS until larger trials are conducted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chua et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: