Why the study?
Does intravenous nicardipine affect sinus node function and AV conduction in patients with or without impaired cardiac conduction?
Does intravenous nicardipine affect sinus node function and AV conduction in patients with or without impaired cardiac conduction?
Intravenous nicardipine affects nodal but not His conduction, and should be administered with care in the presence of sick sinus syndrome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Warrants caution in sick sinus syndrome; extends electrophysiologic characterization of nicardipine to nodal conduction in humans.
We conducted an intracardiac study of the electrophysiologic effects and kinetics of intravenous nicardipine (N) in 16 patients with or without impaired cardiac conduction, using a randomized, double-blind, crossover design versus placebo (P). N or P were infused intravenously over 5 min: the dose of N was 9.46 +/- 3.85 mg. Standard electrophysiologic parameters of atrioventricular (AV) conduction and sinus function were measured under basal conditions, between 10 and 25 min, and at 65 min, after beginning the first infusion of N or P, and between 10 and 25 min after beginning the second infusion of N or P. Treatment with N significantly reduced systolic (S) and diastolic (D) blood pressure (BP) at 10 min (35 +/- 19 and 25 +/- 17 mm Hg, respectively). N significantly shortened sinus cycle length (SCL), corrected sinus recovery time (CSNRT), AH interval, AV node (AVN) Wenckebach cycle length, and anterograde and retrograde effective (ERPs) and functional refractory periods (FRPs) of the AVN. Infranodal parameters were unaffected. Mean plasma N concentrations at 10 min were 18.5 +/- 7.7 ng/ml/kg and 5.3 +/- 3 ng/ml/kg at 60 min. Two patients experienced slight adverse effects (anginal pain and nausea); another with sick sinus syndrome developed a sinus pause. We conclude that intravenous N affects nodal, but not His conduction, and that it should be administered with care in the presence of SSS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: