Why the study?
Does a "Teach to Goal" multisession educational strategy reduce hospitalization and death in patients with heart failure compared to a single-session brief educational intervention?
Does a "Teach to Goal" multisession educational strategy reduce hospitalization and death in patients with heart failure compared to a single-session brief educational intervention?
This paper outlines the theoretical framework and design principles for a 'Teach to Goal' educational intervention aimed at improving self-management in heart failure patients with low health literacy.
Enables testing of literacy-sensitive HF self-management education; leaves open whether teach-to-goal reduces hospitalization or death versus brief intervention.
Self-management is vital for achieving optimal health outcomes for patients with heart failure (HF). We sought to develop an intervention to improve self-management skills and behaviors for patients with HF, especially those with low health literacy. Individuals with low health literacy have difficulty reading and understanding written information and comprehending numerical information and performing calculations, and they tend to have worse baseline knowledge, short-term memory, and working memory compared with individuals with higher health literacy. This paper describes theoretical models that suggest methods to improve the design of educational curricula and programs for low literate audiences, including cognitive load theory and learning mastery theory. We also outline the practical guiding principles for designing our intervention, which includes a multisession educational strategy that teaches patients self-care skills until they reach behavioral goals ("Teach to Goal"). Our intervention strategy is being tested in a randomized controlled trial to determine if it is superior to a single-session brief educational intervention for reducing hospitalization and death. If this trial shows that the "Teach to Goal" approach is superior, it would support the value of incorporating these design principles into educational interventions for other diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baker et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: