Why the study?
Does arteriovenous access blood flow correlate with an increase in left ventricular mass or NT-proBNP levels in haemodialysis patients at high risk for congestive heart failure?
Does arteriovenous access blood flow correlate with an increase in left ventricular mass or NT-proBNP levels in haemodialysis patients at high risk for congestive heart failure?
In haemodialysis patients, while left ventricular mass and NT-proBNP increase over 1 year after AV access creation, these increases do not correlate with AV access blood flow.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AV access creation was associated with rising LVM and NT-proBNP independent of flow; hypothesis-generating for alternative mechanisms in high-risk HD patients.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of congestive heart failure is 3-fold greater than that of acute coronary syndrome in haemodialysis (HD) patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if blood flow through an arteriovenous (AV) access contributes to an increase in left ventricular mass (LVM) that may increase the risk of congestive heart failure. METHODS: We conducted a 1-year prospective cohort study at two Canadian centres of HD patients at high risk for congestive heart failure who had a first AV access created. Patients underwent echocardiography and measurement of plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels before and 1-year post-AV access creation. Access flows were measured within the first month of access maturation and 1-year post-access creation. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Student's t-test, correlation coefficients and regression. RESULTS: One-year post-AV access creation, LVM increased by 12.2 +/- 32% (P = 0.025) and plasma NT-proBNP levels increased by 170 +/- 465% (P = 0.02). The average AV access blood flow did not correlate with an increase in LVM or NT-proBNP levels. CONCLUSIONS: In patients on chronic HD after 1 year, AV access flow does not correlate with increases in LVM by echocardiography or plasma levels of NT-proBNP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hiremath et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: