Key result
High AV access flow over 2000 mL/min linked to ~2.5-fold higher odds of post-op echocardiographic HF.
Why the study?
Arteriovenous fistula or graft (AVF/AVG) creation for haemodialysis alters cardiovascular haemodynamics and may promote adverse cardiac remodelling, but the extent and predictors of post-operative echocardiographic deterioration remained incompletely defined.
Does arteriovenous fistula or graft creation and high access flow (>2000 mL/min) increase the risk of post-operative echocardiographic heart failure parameters in haemodialysis patients?
Cohort (n=141)
Does arteriovenous fistula or graft creation and high access flow (>2000 mL/min) increase the risk of post-operative echocardiographic heart failure parameters in haemodialysis patients?
Echocardiographic cardiac deterioration occurs in nearly half of patients after arteriovenous access creation for haemodialysis, with very high access flow (>2000 mL/min) independently predicting adverse cardiac remodelling.
High-flow AV access may raise post-op echocardiographic HF risk; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before practice change.
Introduction Creation of an arteriovenous fistula or graft (AVF/AVG) for haemodialysis alters cardiovascular haemodynamics and may promote adverse cardiac remodelling. However, the extent and predictors of post-operative echocardiographic deterioration remain incompletely defined. Purpose To quantify echocardiographic changes following AVF/AVG creation and identify predictors of post-operative echocardiographic heart failure parameters. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 141 patients undergoing AVF/AVG creation with paired echocardiograms before and after surgery. Median follow-up was 226 days (interquartile range 96–510). Within-patient changes were analysed using paired statistical tests. A composite post-operative echocardiographic heart failure endpoint was defined as new occurrence of any of the following: left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, pulmonary artery systolic pressure >35 mmHg, right ventricular systolic dysfunction, or new left ventricular dilation relative to baseline. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of this composite outcome, with models adjusted a priori for age and sex. Results Mean left ventricular ejection fraction declined from 52.8±11.1% to 48.9±15.5% (mean change −3.4%, p=0.011). Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter did not change significantly overall. New left ventricular dilation occurred in 29 patients (20.6%), new left ventricular systolic dysfunction in 27 (19.1%), and worsening right ventricular systolic dysfunction in 6 (4.3%). The composite echocardiographic heart failure outcome occurred in 68 patients (48%). Access flow >2000 mL/min was independently associated with the composite endpoint (adjusted odds ratio 2.47, 95% confidence interval 1.01–6.04; p=0.047). Event rates increased progressively across access flow strata (≤1500, 1501–2000, and >2000 mL/min). Conclusions Echocardiographic deterioration after AVF/AVG creation is frequent and heterogeneous. Very high access flow is independently associated with post-operative echocardiographic heart failure, supporting a threshold-dependent relationship between access flow and adverse cardiac remodelling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fisher et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Haemodialysis patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula or graft (AVF/AVG) creation (n=141). Arteriovenous access flow >2000 mL/min after AVF/AVG creation vs. Lower access flow strata (≤1500 and 1501–2000 mL/min) / baseline pre-operative status was evaluated on Composite post-operative echocardiographic heart failure endpoint (new LVEF <40%, PASP >35 mmHg, right ventricular systolic dysfunction, or new left ventricular dilation) (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.01-6.04, p=0.047). Arteriovenous access flow >2000 mL/min independently predicted composite post-operative echocardiographic heart failure (48% overall incidence; aOR 2.47; 95% CI 1.01–6.04; p=0.047).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: