Why the study?
Does AT2-receptor blockade with PD 123319 alter the forearm vasodilator response to Angiotensin II in elderly women receiving candesartan?
Does AT2-receptor blockade with PD 123319 alter the forearm vasodilator response to Angiotensin II in elderly women receiving candesartan?
In elderly women treated with candesartan, AT2-receptor blockade increases forearm vascular resistance but does not completely prevent Angiotensin II-induced vasodilation, suggesting the involvement of other vasodilator mechanisms.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AT2 blockade raises vascular resistance in candesartan-treated elderly women; extends evidence for partial AT2 mediation of Ang II vasodilation with other pathways involved.
The effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) and the Ang II type 2 (AT(2)) receptor antagonist, PD 123319, on forearm vascular resistance (FVR) were studied in elderly women during Ang II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonist therapy. Eight women, aged 67 +/- 6 years, received the AT(1)-receptor antagonist, candesartan, 8-16 mg once-daily for three weeks. FVR responses to intra-brachial arterial infusions of Ang II (8-32 ng/minute) during the co-infusion of PD 123319 (8 microg/minute) or placebo were measured at the end of the second and third weeks in a randomised, double-blind, crossover study. Ang II produced dose-dependent reductions in FVR during both the placebo and PD 123319 infusions. However, FVR was significantly higher during PD 123319 infusions than during placebo infusions. Candesartan therapy unmasks a vasodilator response to Ang II in forearm resistance vessels of elderly women. AT(2)-receptor blockade increases FVR, but does not prevent vasodilator responses to Ang II, suggesting that other vasodilator mechanisms may also be involved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phoon et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: