Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the safety and performance of renal nerve stimulation for diagnostic mapping of the renal nerves.
Does renal nerve stimulation (RNS) safely induce changes in systolic blood pressure to map renal nerves in hypertensive patients?
Does renal nerve stimulation (RNS) safely induce changes in systolic blood pressure to map renal nerves in hypertensive patients?
Diagnostic electrical mapping of renal nerves is safe and induces temporary, location-dependent blood pressure changes, which may help optimize renal sympathetic denervation.
RNS may enable renal nerve mapping in hypertension; hypothesis-generating for optimizing denervation procedures.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of renal nerve stimulation (RNS) for diagnostic mapping of the renal nerves. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this first-in-man study, twenty hypertensive patients underwent RNS using the ConfidenHT system. Bilateral stimulations were performed at three to four sites per artery at 2 and 4 mA. The primary endpoint was change in systolic blood pressure (SBP). Mean office blood pressure was 156/89 mmHg. No periprocedural adverse events occurred. Stimulation with 2 mA resulted in a maximum change of 8.3±6.3 mmHg in SBP (based on 119 stimulations; p<0.001), while stimulating with 4 mA resulted in a maximum change of 10.1±7.8 mmHg (based on 61 stimulations; p<0.001). The mean change in SBP did not vary between mid, distal or branch sites when stimulating at 2 mA but was significantly higher at ostial (23±14 mmHg) than at non-ostial locations (9±7 mmHg) when stimulating at 4 mA (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: RNS can be performed safely and effectively along the renal artery and results in a large variation in temporary BP changes per patient and per anatomic location. RNS might help in optimising treatment effect and selecting potential responders to renal sympathetic denervation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsioufis et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: