Why the study?
The study was conducted to translate, cross-culturally adapt into Portuguese, and evaluate the reliability of the four versions of the Coronary Revascularization Outcome Questionnaire - adapted.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Portuguese version of the Coronary Revascularization Outcome Questionnaire demonstrates satisfactory cross-cultural adaptation and reliable pre-procedure versions for assessing quality of life in CAD patients.
OBJECTIVE: to carry out translation, cross-cultural adaptation to Portuguese and assess the reliability of the four versions of the Coronary Revascularization Outcome Questionnaire - adapted. METHODS: a methodological study of translation and cross-cultural adaptation into Portuguese, as proposed by Beaton et al., and reliability analysis, by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item-total correlation of the four versions of the Coronary Revascularization Outcome Questionnaire - adapted. RESULTS: the adaptations made facilitated the understanding of the items. All domains had Cronbach's alpha above 0.70, except two in the post-percutaneous coronary intervention version and two in the post-myocardial surgical revascularization version. All items had item-total correlation values greater than 0.20, except two in the post-percutaneous coronary intervention version, one in the pre-coronary intervention version and six in the post-myocardial surgical revascularization version. CONCLUSION: the cross-cultural adaptation to Portuguese was considered satisfactory. Pre-procedure versions were considered reliable, while the post-procedures require other psychometric analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Assis et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: