Why the study?
Mean platelet volume indicates platelet reactivity and could serve as a biomarker of risk and prognosis in STEMI, prompting evaluation of its predictive value for thrombus burden and short-term outcomes.
Does higher mean platelet volume on admission predict higher angiographic thrombus burden and worse short-term outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Does higher mean platelet volume on admission predict higher angiographic thrombus burden and worse short-term outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher mean platelet volume on admission in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI is associated with greater angiographic thrombus burden, worse myocardial perfusion, and poorer short-term clinical outcomes.
Background: Mean platelet volume (MPV), is an indicator of platelet reactivity and could be a biomarker of the risk and prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Objectives: Testing the predictive value of MPV for angiographic thrombus burden and short-term outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Patients and Methods: Seventy-two patients presented with acute STEMI to the Cardiology Department of Ain Shams University Hospitals for PPCI. MPV was measured on admission. Angiographic thrombus burden and post-interventional thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and myocardial blush grade (MBG) were recorded. Patients were followed up for 3 to 6 months. Results: The patients' ages ranged between 33 and 73 (mean age 53.22 ± 9.96 years). This study included 62 males and 10 females. The MPV of the studied cases was 9.97 ± 1.31 fl. MPV was higher among patients with high thrombus burden (HTB) (11.42±1.007 vs. 9.53±1.039. p < 0.001) and patients with MBG (0-1) and TIMI flow>3 (10.59±1.839 vs 9.81±1.092, p 0.04 and 11.77±0.74 vs 9.87±1.26, p 0.004 respectively). The primary composite endpoint occurred in 12 patients with a higher MPV (10.95 ± 1.14 vs. 9.73 ± 1.29, p 0.01). In univariate regression analysis for the predictors of MBG (0/1), the MPV was an independent predictor of MBG (odds ratio 0.487, and p <0.006), CI (0.292- 0.811). Conclusion: MPV may be a useful biomarker to help identify higher-risk patients with large intracoronary thrombus burden, who might require more potent antiplatelet therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2024 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: