Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 26, 2017Circulation Cardiovascular InterventionsOpen Access

Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

Shao‐Liang Chen
Shao‐Liang ChenInterventional / Structural CardiologyTSTeguh SantosoUniversitas WiralodraJZJunjie ZhangNational Natural Science Foundation of China

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8823cfa95381ace1bbfde9https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.116.004497
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Stent Thrombosis in Randomized Clinical Trials of Drug-Eluting Stents2007 · 1,447 citations
  2. 2A Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Double Kissing Crush With Provisional Stenting for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions2011 · 286 citations
  3. 3Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions2008 · 330 citations
  4. 4Impact of the Complexity of Bifurcation Lesions Treated With Drug-Eluting Stents2014 · 215 citations
  5. 5Intravascular ultrasound‐guided systematic two‐stent techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions and reduced late stent thrombosis2012 · 61 citations