Key result
In a hamster model of experimental sepsis, ivabradine improved functional capillary density compared to saline and reduced organ dysfunction.
Why the study?
Does ivabradine improve microcirculatory dysfunction in a murine model of abdominal sepsis?
Does ivabradine improve microcirculatory dysfunction in a murine model of abdominal sepsis?
Ivabradine attenuates microvascular derangements and reduces organ dysfunction in a murine model of experimental sepsis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for ivabradine in experimental sepsis microcirculation; leaves open translation to clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Experimental data suggest that ivabradine, an inhibitor of the pacemaker current in sinoatrial node, exerts beneficial effects on endothelial cell function, but it is unclear if this drug could prevent microcirculatory dysfunction in septic subjects, improving tissue perfusion and reducing organ failure. Therefore, this study was designed to characterize the microcirculatory effects of ivabradine on a murine model of abdominal sepsis using intravital videomicroscopy. METHODS: Twenty-eight golden Syrian hamsters were allocated in four groups: sham-operated animals, nontreated septic animals, septic animals treated with saline, and septic animals treated with ivabradine (2.0 mg/kg intravenous bolus + 0.5 mg · kg · h). The primary endpoint was the effect of ivabradine on the microcirculation of skinfold chamber preparations, assessed by changes in microvascular reactivity and rheologic variables, and the secondary endpoint was its effects on organ function, evaluated by differences in arterial blood pressure, motor activity score, arterial blood gases, and hematologic and biochemical parameters among groups. RESULTS: Compared with septic animals treated with saline, those treated with ivabradine had greater functional capillary density (90 ± 4% of baseline values vs. 71 ± 16%; P < 0.001), erythrocyte velocity in capillaries (87 ± 11% of baseline values vs. 62 ± 14%; P < 0.001), and arteriolar diameter (99 ± 4% of baseline values vs. 91 ± 7%; P = 0.041) at the end of the experiment. Besides that, ivabradine-treated animals had less renal, hepatic, and neurologic dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Ivabradine was effective in reducing microvascular derangements evoked by experimental sepsis, which was accompanied by less organ dysfunction. These results suggest that ivabradine yields beneficial effects on the microcirculation of septic animals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miranda et al. (2016) studied Experimental sepsis (n=28). Ivabradine vs. Saline was evaluated on Microcirculation of skinfold chamber preparations (functional capillary density) (p=<0.001). In a hamster model of experimental sepsis, ivabradine improved functional capillary density compared to saline and reduced organ dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: