Key result
During ventricular fibrillation in swine, Vmax was a more important determinant of action potential duration, entering the regression equation in 86% of episodes vs 58% for previous diastolic interval.
Why the study?
Does the maximum rate of depolarization (Vmax) predict action potential duration during ventricular fibrillation in a swine model?
Does the maximum rate of depolarization (Vmax) predict action potential duration during ventricular fibrillation in a swine model?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
During the first 20 seconds of ventricular fibrillation in a swine model, the maximum rate of depolarization is a more important determinant of action potential duration than restitution or memory.
During ventricular fibrillation (VF) only 39% of the variation in action potential duration (APD) is accounted for by the previous diastolic interval [DI((n-1))], i.e., restitution, and the previous APD [APD((n-1))], i.e., memory. We tested the hypothesis that a characteristic of the AP upstroke, the maximum rate of depolarization (V(max)), also helps account for its APD. A floating microelectrode was used to make transmembrane recordings at 16,000 samples/s from the anterior left ventricular wall during four 20-s episodes of VF in each of six pigs. V(max), time from V(max) to 60% repolarization (APD(60)), and DI were calculated throughout all episodes. Stepwise linear regression was used to determine how well each APD(60) (APD(60n)) was predicted by V(max) of that AP, the four previous DIs (n-1, n - 2, n - 3, n - 4), and the three previous APD(60)s (n-1, n - 2, n - 3). V(max) entered in the regression equation significantly more often (86% of VF episodes) than either APD((n-1)) (47% of episodes) or DI((n-1)) (58% of episodes). When these three variables entered first or second, their coefficients were almost always positive, consistent with a longer APD associated with 1) a larger V(max), 2) a longer APD((n-1)), and 3) a longer DI((n-1)). R(2) of the regression for all entered variables was 0.51 +/- 0.01 (mean +/- SD). During the first 20 s of VF in swine, V(max) is a more important determinant of APD than the previous DI (restitution) or the previous APD (memory). All variables together account for only one-half of APD variation during VF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2007) studied Ventricular fibrillation (n=6). Maximum rate of depolarization (Vmax) vs. Previous diastolic interval (restitution) and previous action potential duration (memory) was evaluated on Entry into stepwise linear regression equation for predicting action potential duration (APD60). During ventricular fibrillation in swine, Vmax was a more important determinant of action potential duration, entering the regression equation in 86% of episodes vs 58% for previous diastolic interval.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: