Key result
Increased epicardial adipose tissue thickness was independently associated with a higher risk of in-stent restenosis (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.01-1.33; p=0.007).
Why the study?
Does echocardiographically measured epicardial adipose tissue thickness predict target lesion revascularization in patients after successful coronary stenting?
Cohort (n=407)
Does echocardiographically measured epicardial adipose tissue thickness predict target lesion revascularization in patients after successful coronary stenting?
Odds Ratio: 1.19 (95% CI 1.01–1.33)
p-value: p=0.007
Echocardiographically measured epicardial fat thickness is an independent predictor of in-stent restenosis and target lesion revascularization after coronary stenting.
May aid post-stent restenosis risk assessment; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), deposited around subepicardial coronary vessels, may contribute directly to perivascular inflammation and smooth muscle cell proliferation. This study assessed the relationship between EAT and in-stent restenosis. METHODS: Four hundred and seven patients had received successful coronary intervention. EAT thickness was measured by echocardiography. Angiographic follow-up was obtained between 6 months and 2 years. Restenosis was defined as target lesion revascularization (TLR). EAT thickness of patients was compared by TLR controlling for additional well-known predictors of restenosis. The TLR-free survival analysis according to EAT thickness was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the differences between groups were assessed by the log-rank test. RESULTS: Median EAT thickness was significantly increased in patients undergoing TLR compared with those without restenosis (3.7 vs. 3.0 mm, p = 0.001). EAT thickness was one of the independent factors associated with restenosis (Odds ratio = 1.19, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.33, p = 0.007). The TLR-free survival of patients with thick EAT was significantly worse than patients with thin EAT (log-rank p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: EAT thickness is related with restenosis and may provide additional information for future restenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Coronary stenting (n=407). Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness vs. Lower EAT thickness was evaluated on Restenosis (target lesion revascularization) (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.33, p=0.007). Increased epicardial adipose tissue thickness was independently associated with a higher risk of in-stent restenosis (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.01-1.33; p=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: