Why the study?
Does medical or surgical therapy reduce mortality in patients with aortic dissection compared to no therapy?
Does medical or surgical therapy reduce mortality in patients with aortic dissection compared to no therapy?
Prompt recognition and appropriate medical or surgical therapy for aortic dissection dramatically reduces mortality from over 90% at one year to less than 20%.
Therapy may reduce aortic dissection mortality; leaves open need for prospective trials to confirm benefit.
DISSECTION of the aorta is the most common acute disease of the aorta. Without therapy, it is highly lethal. In the classic series of Hirst et al,¹62% of the patients were dead within seven days of the time of the onset of symptoms, and 93% were dead within a year. Few patients die instantaneously; the majority survive long enough for the diagnosis to be made. If the clinician recognizes dissection of the aorta, he now has available highly successful medical or surgical therapy. With appropriate therapy, the mortality of dissection is less than 20%.² Recognition of aortic dissection is difficult because it is almost always confused with acute myocardial infarction. Pathophysiology The lesion that predisposes to dissection is cystic medial necrosis.³The cause of cystic medial necrosis is unknown. We do know that hypertension and Marfan's syndrome predispose to this lesion in the media of the
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. E. Dalen (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: