Key result
Computed tomography and central line measurements demonstrated high agreement for assessing the distance from the aortic valve plane to the Impella inlet (ICC 0.91).
Why the study?
The usefulness of chest radiography and computed tomography for assessing optimal Impella positioning compared to echocardiography needed to be identified.
Do computed tomography and chest radiography accurately assess optimal Impella positioning compared to echocardiography in patients with an Impella heart pump?
Observational
Do computed tomography and chest radiography accurately assess optimal Impella positioning compared to echocardiography in patients with an Impella heart pump?
Effect estimate: ICC 0.91 (95% CI 0.848-0.946)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Computed tomography and chest radiography measurements can reliably identify the need for Impella repositioning, demonstrating notable agreement with echocardiography.
Shorter CT inlet distance was associated with repositioning; hypothesis-generating for CT in Impella positioning assessment.
Objectives The objectives of the study are to identify usefulness of chest radiography (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) for the assessment of optimal Impella positioning compared to echocardiography. Material and Methods In this retrospective study, records of 500 patients were reviewed, 95 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The distance from the carina, top of the aortic arch, and in case of CT, from the aortic valve plane to the Impella inlet port was measured. Subjects were stratified into two groups based on echocardiography: Those that did require repositioning and those that did not. Results CT revealed greater distance from the carina to the aortic valve plane in patients requiring Impella repositioning compared to those which did not (81.6 ± 15.9 mm vs. 67 ± 13.2 mm, P = 0.019). The distance from the aortic valve plane to the Impella inlet was shorter in repositioned cases on CT (22.3 ± 28.6 mm vs. 35.8 ± 13.3 mm, P = 0.045). The expected location of the aortic valve plane was 6.8 ± 1.3 cm from the carina among CT cases, representing a useful measurement for evaluation on CXR. Significant predictors of aortic valve plane to carina distance on CT were found to be aortic arch to Impella outlet on CXR ( P < 0.0001) and carina to Impella outlet on CXR ( P < 0.0001). Conclusions CT imaging correctly identified patients that required repositioning on echocardiography. Key CT measurements serve as crucial indicators for repositioning and there is notable agreement on measurements across CXR and CT as well as CT and echocardiography in identification of Impella high or low positioning. In addition, there is evidence of significant predictors of CT measurements from CXR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoang et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Patients with Impella heart pump. Computed tomography (CT) vs. Chest radiography (CXR) and other imaging modalities was evaluated on Imaging modality agreement (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient) for Aortic Valve Plane to Impella Inlet between CT and Central Line (ICC 0.91, 95% CI 0.848-0.946, p=<0.0001). Computed tomography and central line measurements demonstrated high agreement for assessing the distance from the aortic valve plane to the Impella inlet (ICC 0.91).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: