Why the study?
High BMI can restrict the use of PPV and SVV to predict fluid responsiveness due to altered respiratory compliance, intra-abdominal pressure, and stroke volume in the prone position.
Does a mini-fluid challenge predict fluid responsiveness better than pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in obese patients undergoing surgery in the prone position?
Does a mini-fluid challenge predict fluid responsiveness better than pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in obese patients undergoing surgery in the prone position?
A 100 mL mini-fluid challenge accurately predicts fluid responsiveness in obese patients in the prone position, outperforming standard pulse pressure and stroke volume variations.
May support MFC-guided fluid decisions in obese prone surgery; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) can predict fluid responsiveness effectively. However, high Body Mass Index (BMI) can restrict their use due to changes in respiratory system compliance (CS), intra-abdominal pressure, and stroke volume (SV) in the prone position. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of mini-fluid challenge (MFC) in predicting fluid responsiveness in obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) patients in the prone position. METHODS: A total of 33 patients undergoing neurosurgery were included. After standardized anesthesia induction, patients' PPV, SVV, stroke volume index (SVI) and CS values were recorded in the prone position (T1), after the infusion of 100 mL of crystalloid named as MFC (T2) and after fluid loading was completed with additional 400 mL of crystalloid. Patients whose SVI increased more than 15% after the fluid loading were defined as volume responders. RESULTS: Fifteen (45%) patients were responders to 500 mL fluid loading. After the 100 mL fluid load, a higher percentage increase in SVI was observed among responders (P<0.001), with values of 6.6% (6.2-8.6%) and 3.5% (1.7-4.8%) in responders and non-responders, respectively. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of MFC, PPV, and SVV were 0.967 (95% CI: 0.838-0.999), 0.683 (95% CI: 0.499-0.834), and 0.709 (95% CI: 0.526-0.853), respectively. The area under the curve of MFC was significantly higher than that of PPV (P=0.003) and SVV (P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The increase in SVI after a rapid infusion of 100 mL crystalloid could predict fluid responsiveness in patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 in the prone position.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: