Why the study?
Does co-induction with propofol and sevoflurane improve cardiovascular parameters compared to sevoflurane alone in elderly patients requiring surgery for fractured neck of femur?
Does co-induction with propofol and sevoflurane improve cardiovascular parameters compared to sevoflurane alone in elderly patients requiring surgery for fractured neck of femur?
Co-induction with low-dose propofol and sevoflurane is an acceptable alternative to sevoflurane alone in elderly patients, offering faster induction with similar haemodynamic stability.
Supports co-induction for faster induction without haemodynamic cost in elderly fracture patients; extends RCT evidence for balanced techniques in frail populations.
BACKGROUND: The induction of general anaesthesia is associated with the greatest cardiovascular changes in elderly patients. Induction can be performed either intravenously or with gaseous induction. Sevoflurane has advantages over propofol for induction of anaesthesia in the elderly, since the lower reduction in mean arterial pressure with sevoflurane is both statistically and clinically significant. This prospective randomized controlled trial investigated the cardiovascular benefits of co-induction of anaesthesia with 0.75 mg kg(-1) propofol and 8% sevoflurane, when compared with 8% sevoflurane alone in patients requiring surgery for fractured neck of femur. METHOD: In total, 38 patients aged 75 or over were allocated into the two groups, receiving either 0.75 mg kg(-1) of propofol followed by 8% sevoflurane or 8% sevoflurane alone. Vital signs were recorded until successful insertion of a laryngeal mask. Induction times, induction events and patient satisfaction scores were also recorded. RESULTS: Results showed that there were no differences in the cardiovascular parameters between the two groups. Induction times were faster in the propofol and sevoflurane group (62 vs. 81 s; P = 0.028). The postoperative questionnaire showed that the majority of patients in both groups were satisfied with the induction process. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that 0.75 mg kg(-1) of propofol followed by sevoflurane induction is an acceptable alternative to sevoflurane induction. It is associated with similar haemodynamic variables, faster induction times and is very well tolerated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moran et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: