Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SynopsisSound coherent deposits of tungsten-cobalt alloys with up to 60–66 wt. % of tungsten can be produced at cathode current efficiencies of up to 21% from solutions containing 40–70 g./l. of tungsten as sodium tungstate, 4–12 g./l. of cobalt as cobalt sulphate, 70–150 g./l. of citric acid and 50 g./l. of ammonium chloride, adjusted to room-temperature pH of 7·5–8·5 with sodium hydroxide, and operated at 50–70° C. with interrupted d.c. pulses of 0·05–2 sees, and equal or rather greater “off” periods, the cathode current density during the pulses being 5–20 amps./dm.2. Moderate agitation of the solution is desirable.Hydrogen overpotential for hydrogen deposition from citrate buffers is much less on tungsten-cobalt cathodes than on tungsten or cobalt cathodes. Evidently the electronic structure of the alloy cathodes is much more favourable than that of tungsten for hydrogen deposition: this suggests that it is also more favourable for tungsten deposition, which may help to explain why tungsten-cobalt alloys are so much more easily deposited than pure tungsten.A number of amphipathic organic molecules, among them thiourea, benzenesulphonamide and pyridine, increase the hydrogen overpotential on tungsten-cobalt alloys: but they do not increase the cathode current efficiency of alloy deposition, evidently because they increase the metal-deposition overpotential about equally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoar et al. (1954) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: