Why the study?
Do 'new' pharmacological classes of antihypertensive drugs improve long-term morbidity and mortality compared to 'old' pharmacological classes in patients with systemic hypertension?
Do 'new' pharmacological classes of antihypertensive drugs improve long-term morbidity and mortality compared to 'old' pharmacological classes in patients with systemic hypertension?
This review summarizes ongoing clinical trials comparing new versus old antihypertensive drug classes for long-term morbidity and mortality.
No practice change warranted yet; leaves open whether newer antihypertensive classes improve long-term outcomes.
Hypertension was identified as a cardiovascular risk factor in the late fifties and still remains a public health issue. The number of patients treated reaches only half of those diagnosed and, of those treated, half fail to reach target blood pressure. Furthermore, the number of antihypertensive drugs reaching the market has increased exponentially in the last few years, however, the impact on treatment and on attaining target blood pressure levels remains to be seen. The high percentage of treated patients who do not reach target blood pressure, combined with the high number of patients requiring more than one antihypertensive drug, have triggered a series of long-term morbidity and mortality trials comparing different therapeutic approaches ('new' pharmacological classes vs. 'old' pharmacological classes). These are described in this paper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ODDOU et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: