Key result
Calf blood pressure was not superior to arm BP in predicting arterial stiffness, though supine calf BP of 164/81 mmHg and standing calf BP of 217/137 mmHg equated to 140/90 mmHg arm BP.
Why the study?
Leg BP measurement is needed when arm BP is not feasible, and calf BP, especially standing, may have greater association with cardiovascular remodeling than arm BP.
Is calf blood pressure superior to arm blood pressure in predicting increased arterial stiffness in the general population?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,397)
Is calf blood pressure superior to arm blood pressure in predicting increased arterial stiffness in the general population?
Calf blood pressure is not superior to arm blood pressure for predicting arterial stiffness, but specific thresholds (165/80 mmHg supine, 220/135 mmHg standing) can be used to diagnose hypertension when only calf measurements are available.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Arm BP remains standard for stiffness assessment; leaves open validation of posture-specific calf thresholds in prospective cohorts.
AIM: Leg blood pressure (BP) measurement is needed when arm BP evaluation is not feasible, and calf BP, especially when measured in standing position, may have greater association with cardiovascular remodeling than arm BP. This study evaluated the relationship between calf and arm BP, and investigated whether calf BP would be superior to arm BP in predicting increased arterial stiffness [pulse wave velocity (PWV) > 10 m/s]. METHODS: We evaluated clinical and laboratory characteristics, BP measurements, and PWV in 1397 individuals resident in Baependi, Brazil, between 2017 and 2019. Arm BP was measured in the seated and supine positions while calf BP was measured in supine and standing positions using digital oscillometric devices. Carotid-femoral PWV was measured using a noninvasive mechanotransducer. RESULTS: The sample had 62.7% females, age = 48.1 ± 15.4 years and 8.4% with PWV >10 m/s. Results of linear regression analysis showed that BP values of 140/90 mmHg measured in the arm in supine and seated position were equivalent to calf supine BP values of 164/81 mmHg and 166/78 mmHg and calf standing BP values of 217/137 mmHg and 221/137 mmHg, respectively. Calf-arm BP differences were associated with age, glomerular filtration rate, body mass index, smoking, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, diabetes and height. Furthermore, stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that arm supine systolic BP, but not calf BP measurements, was independently associated with increased arterial stiffness. CONCLUSION: Thresholds of ≈165/80 mmHg and ≈220/135 mmHg could be used for diagnosing hypertension when only calf measurements in supine and standing positions, respectively, are available. Conversely, calf BP was not superior to arm BP in predicting increased arterial stiffness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marques et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in General population (n=1,397). Calf blood pressure measurement vs. Arm blood pressure measurement was evaluated on Increased arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity > 10 m/s). Calf blood pressure was not superior to arm BP in predicting arterial stiffness, though supine calf BP of 164/81 mmHg and standing calf BP of 217/137 mmHg equated to 140/90 mmHg arm BP.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: