Key result
Measurement of carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity using the ARTSENS imageless ultrasound device demonstrated excellent agreement when cross-validated against the SphygmoCor device.
Why the study?
Does the ARTSENS device accurately measure cfPWV compared to the SphygmoCor device in human subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=41)
Does the ARTSENS device accurately measure cfPWV compared to the SphygmoCor device in human subjects?
The ARTSENS device provides a fully automated, imageless ultrasound method for measuring both local and regional arterial stiffness that shows excellent agreement with the gold-standard SphygmoCor device.
Arterial stiffness (AS) has been shown to be an important marker for risk assessment of cardiovascular events. Local arterial stiffness (LAS) is conventionally measured by evaluating arterial distensibility at particular arterial sites through ultrasound imaging systems. Regional arterial stiffness (RAS) is generally obtained by evaluating carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) through tonometric devices. RAS has a better prognostic value than LAS and cfPWV is considered as the gold standard of AS. Over the past few years our group has been developing ARTerial Stiffness Evaluation for Non-Invasive Screening (ARTSENS), an inexpensive and portable device to measure the LAS. It uses a single element ultrasound transducer to obtain A-Mode frames from the desired artery and is fully automated to enable a non-expert to perform measurements. In this work, we report an extension of ARTSENS to enable measurement of cfPWV that now makes it the only fully automatic device that can measure both LAS and RAS. In this paper, we provide a general review of the ARTSENS and compare it with other state-of-the-art AS measurement systems. cfPWV measurement using ARTSENS was cross-validated against SphygmoCor by successive measurements with both devices on 41 human subjects and excellent agreement between both devices was demonstrated (Coefficient of determination and, limits of agreement m/s). The inter-device correlation between ARTSENS and SphygmoCor was found to be better than other similar studies reported in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahani et al. (2015) reported a cross-sectional. ARTSENS (imageless ultrasound device) vs. SphygmoCor was evaluated on Carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) measurement agreement. Measurement of carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity using the ARTSENS imageless ultrasound device demonstrated excellent agreement when cross-validated against the SphygmoCor device.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: