Why the study?
Does the ARTSENS device accurately measure augmentation index compared to the Hitachi-Aloka eTRACKING system in volunteers?
Does the ARTSENS device accurately measure augmentation index compared to the Hitachi-Aloka eTRACKING system in volunteers?
The low-cost, automated ARTSENS device can accurately estimate the augmentation index, showing excellent agreement with a state-of-the-art commercial system.
Supports ARTSENS as affordable AIx alternative in volunteers; leaves open clinical validation before practice change.
Over past few years our group has been developing a fully automated and low-cost device, ARTSENS (ARTerial Stiffness Evaluation for Non-invasive Screening), to enable non-experts to measure arterial stiffness (AS). It uses a single element ultrasound transducer to obtain A-mode frames from a superficial artery such as the common carotid artery (CCA) and analyzes them to obtain the stiffness parameters of the vessel. We have earlier demonstrated that ARTSENS can accurately measure local arterial stiffness (LAS) and regional arterial stiffness (RAS) by tracing the distension waveforms of the CCA and the femoral artery. In this paper, we show that it is possible to estimate the augmentation index (AIx), a measure of the global arterial mechanics, from the distension waveforms obtained by ARTSENS. AIx measurements from ARTSENS are compared against the state-of-the-art Hitachi-Aloka eTRACKING system for 107 volunteers. Both devices show excellent agreement with a correlation coefficient (r) = 0.82 (p < 0.0001), which is comparable to similar studies reported in the literature. This development makes ARTSENS a unique device that can measure the three most widely used indices of arterial mechanics—LAS, RAS and the AIx.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahani et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: