Key result
Rivaroxaban demonstrated similar efficacy and complication rates compared to warfarin for recurrent deep venous thrombosis, with a significant reduction in time to symptom relief.
Why the study?
Vitamin K antagonists have a narrow therapeutic range and multiple drug interactions, prompting the need to compare newer direct factor Xa inhibitors like rivaroxaban against warfarin for recurrent DVT.
Does rivaroxaban improve efficacy and safety compared to warfarin in patients with recurrent deep venous thrombosis?
Cohort (n=30)
Does rivaroxaban improve efficacy and safety compared to warfarin in patients with recurrent deep venous thrombosis?
Rivaroxaban demonstrates similar efficacy and safety to warfarin for the treatment of recurrent DVT, with the added benefit of faster symptom relief.
Supports faster symptom relief with rivaroxaban in recurrent DVT; hypothesis-generating and requires RCT confirmation before practice change.
Background: Venous Thrombo-Embolism (VTE) manifestsas Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) and/or Pulmonary Em-bolism (PE). Per 1000 persons in the general population, theannual incidence is 1 to 2 cases. For decades, the gold standard of anti-thrombotic therapy has been based on heparins and Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs), their narrow therapeutic range and multiple interactions led to the development of New Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) beginning in 2003. Two types of new anticoagulants have been developed: Direct factor Xa inhibitors (Rivaroxaban) and direct factor IIa (thrombin) inhibitors.Aim of Study: The aim of this study was to comparerivaroxaban versus warfarin in treatment of recurrent DVTas regard efficacy, safety and complications.Patients and Methods: This was a prospective studyconducted on 30 patients suffering from recurrent deep venousthrombosis. The studied cases were divided into two groups,Group A treated by rivaroxaban, while group B treated bywarfarin over a period of 6 months. All cases were subjectedto full history taking, complete general and local examination,routine laboratory investigations and Duplex Scanning.Results: No statistically significant differences amongrivaroxaban and warfarin groups as regards presence of riskfactors, DVT extension, duplex results and incidence ofcomplications, while there was significant difference as regardsduration till symptoms relief.Conclusion: Rivaroxaban seems to have same efficacyas warfarin with advantage being earlier in symptoms relief/days, recanalization and patient compliance. In addition,warfarin users need to be monitored regularly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
YOUSEF et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Recurrent deep venous thrombosis (n=30). Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Efficacy, safety, and complications. Rivaroxaban demonstrated similar efficacy and complication rates compared to warfarin for recurrent deep venous thrombosis, with a significant reduction in time to symptom relief.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: