Key result
Combined thrombus burden reduction therapy during primary PCI significantly increased the percentage of patients achieving TMPG 3 (68.2% vs 33.3%) compared to thrombus aspiration alone.
Why the study?
High thrombus burden induces slow-flow and no-reflow during primary PCI and is linked to poor prognosis; whether combined thrombus reduction improves microcirculation and long-term cardiac function was unknown.
Does combined thrombus burden reduction therapy (aspiration plus intracoronary urokinase, tirofiban, and nitroglycerin) improve myocardial perfusion and cardiac function in patients with anterior wall STEMI and high thrombus burden undergoing primary PCI?
RCT (n=46)
Single-blind
1:1 ratio
No
Does combined thrombus burden reduction therapy (aspiration plus intracoronary urokinase, tirofiban, and nitroglycerin) improve myocardial perfusion and cardiac function in patients with anterior wall STEMI and high thrombus burden undergoing primary PCI?
Absolute Event Rate: 68.2% vs 33.3%
p-value: p=0.006
High thrombus burden induced slow-flow and no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and is associated with a poor prognosis. We aimed to investigate whether a combined thrombus burden reduction therapy during primary PCI, could improve microcirculation and enhance cardiac function in the long-term.Anterior wall STEMI patients with high thrombus burden were randomly assigned to receive a combined thrombus burden reduction therapy or thrombus aspiration alone. The primary end points included the percentage of patients with TMPG (TIMI myocardial perfusion grade) 3, STR (ST-segment resolution) above 70%, the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) difference.Twenty-two patients in the combined interventional group and 24 in the control group completed 1-year follow-up. The percentages of patients with TMPG 3 (68.2% versus 33.3%, P = 0.006) and STR above 70% (63.6% versus 25%, P = 0.016) were significantly higher in the combined group. IMR was significantly lower in the combined interventional group (31.50 ± 13.39 U versus 62.72 ± 22.80 U, P = 0.002). At 3 months and 1 year, the overall LVEF value was better in the combined interventional group (42.1% versus 40.0%, P = 0.049; 41.9% versus 39.8%, P = 0.042), respectively. The IMR value was negatively correlated with the EF value at 3 months (r = -0.145, P = 0.013) and 1 year (r = -0.333, P = 0.031).A combined thrombus burden reduction therapy during primary PCI can safely reduce thrombus burden, improve myocardial tissue perfusion, and improve cardiac function among STEMI patients with high thrombus burden. IMR might be a good predictor for post-myocardial infarction cardiac function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction (n=46). Combined thrombus burden reduction therapy vs. Thrombus aspiration alone was evaluated on Percentage of patients with TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) 3 (p=0.006). Combined thrombus burden reduction therapy during primary PCI significantly increased the percentage of patients achieving TMPG 3 (68.2% vs 33.3%) compared to thrombus aspiration alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: