Essential hypertension

Essential hypertension is characterized by chronic elevation of blood pressure (BP) due to an unknown cause. It affects nearly 95% of hypertensive patients [1]. Genetic causes account for about half of essential hypertension (see below). In the USA, more than 65 million adults have essential hypertension [2]. As essential hypertension is usually asymptomatic and requires lifelong treatment, only 70% of these people become aware that they have elevated BP, only 59% are being treated and only 34% have well controlled BP [2]. Sustained high BP due to undiagnosed, untreated or suboptimally treated hypertension leads to target-organ damage. Epidemiological data indicate that essential hypertension is a major modifiable risk factor for coronary heart disease, stroke, congestive heart failure and renal failure [2]. As its pathogenesis is left unclear, treatment of essential hypertension remains largely empiric, with physicians selecting one or several different kinds of antihypertensive medicines until BP is adequately controlled. Because of the high prevalence of essential hypertension, the inability to make treatment specifically directed at the underlying cause, and the need for lifelong treatment and follow-up, the care of patients with essential hypertension has become one of the largest expenses in the American healthcare budget. In the past several decades, a wide variety of physiological studies have established that many signaling pathways affect short-term BP regulation [3]. These include the renin–angiotensin II–aldosterone system, sympathetic nerve–adrenergic receptor system, a series of genes participating in control of renal salt handling [4], endothelin and its A receptor signaling in vascular smooth muscle (VSM) cells, pathways which all result in vasoconstriction, and factors produced by vessel endothelial cells that cause vasodilation (e.g. nitric oxide) (Fig. 1). Although the effect of these systems has been established for short-term BP regulation, determining which of these pathways contributes to essential hypertension as primary alterations or secondary responses has proven difficult. However, study of monogenic forms of essential hypertension has consistently shown that genetic hypertension originally derives from variations of genes involved in renal salt handling [3,4]. Activation of any one of these pathways leads to resistance arterial remodeling and increased vascular tone, resulting in high BP. Once elevated vascular tone is established, it cannot be returned to the original normal point, even though available antihypertensive drugs alone or in combination can effectively and temporarily reverse the vascular tone to normal. The critical issue to be elucidated in the next decade is what common downstream gene activation in these signaling pathways triggers irreversible vascular remodeling to cause a new set point for vascular tone. If a target gene responsible for the final common pathway converging from these different signaling systems is identified, a novel antihypertensive medicine against this gene activity could permanently alter vascular remodeling and reverse elevated vascular tone to normal. Such a therapy could replace lifelong treatment, which not only brings about a huge expense in healthcare but also can cause lack of adherence and compliance to the medical regimen, leading to inadequate BP control. Another important issue is what factors cause essential hypertension. With advances from molecular biology, it is well accepted that essential hypertension is an age-dependent, complex common trait resulting from the interaction of environmental, epigenetic and genetic determinants (Fig. 1). However, the pathogenesis of essential hypertension is largely not understood despite intense efforts.Fig. 1: No captions available.A variety of environmental factors, such as smoking, socioeconomic status, stress, high salt diets, obesity and vitamin D deficiency, have been shown to play roles in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension. These factors cause essential hypertension through epigenetic and genetic interaction, or by the induction of specific gene expression. Although the exact mechanisms by which environmental factors cause essential hypertension are not clear, recent research has provided exciting clues shedding light on the mechanisms of salt and vitamin D deficiency-induced hypertension. Wirth et al.[5] showed that G12-G13 leukemia-associated Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor signaling in VSM cells mediates salt-induced hypertension. Several human studies have demonstrated that vitamin D deficiency in some populations leads to essential hypertension [6,7]. Further studies have shown that vitamin D receptor (VDR) knockout [8] and 1-α-hydroxylase knockout [9] mice develop hypertension accompanied by elevated renin gene expression, which was confirmed in the kidney tissue of our VDR total knockout mice [10]. We also showed that vitamin D inhibited angiotensin II-induced or endothelin-induced cell proliferation and the key cell cycle determinant, Cdc25A, expression in VSM cells [11,12], as well as activated natriuretic peptide receptor A expression in VSM cells, and inner medullary collecting duct cells in vitro and in vivo[13,14]. It remains unclear so far whether these alterations in gene expression are involved in vitamin D deficiency-induced hypertension, but the results are suggestive. Continued efforts are needed to elucidate the complex interaction among genes, the physiological and the environmental factors that occur in essential hypertension and identify how these factors trigger the development of essential hypertension through alteration of gene expression. Understanding gene and environmental interaction may allow more rational introduction of environmental interventions in an attempt to prevent future occurrence of the disease in at-risk people. Epigenetics refers to regulation of gene expression without altering DNA sequence. It occurs by chromatin remodeling through DNA methylation, histone modification, RNA [including microRNA (miRNA) and noncoding RNA]-mediated gene regulation, genomic imprinting, chromosomal inactivation and transposable elements [15]. Epigenetics offers a potential explanation for how environmental factors and aging impact the individual genetic background to produce variation in the disease. Epigenetic regulation can be a dynamic process or result in heritable changes in gene expression. Emerging studies have shown that epigenetic modification is involved in the development of essential hypertension [16]. Recent studies showed methylation of CpG islands in the promoter and first exon of the 11-β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11β-HSD2) gene leading to decreased transcription and activity of the enzyme [17]. Loss-of-function mutation of this gene leads to salt-sensitive hypertension [18]. Elevated 11b-HSD2 promoter methylation decreased 11b-HSD2 activity and was associated with hypertensive patients [19]. Large-scale epigenome-wide human studies are needed to identify the role of methylation mechanisms in essential hypertension. In addition, histone modification is also causally linked to essential hypertension. With no K (lysine) protein kinase 4 (WNK4), a serine/threonine protein kinase regulates renal tubular sodium reabsorption. Patients with loss-of-function mutations in the WNK4 gene displayed salt-sensitive hypertension [20]. Mu et al.[21] recently showed that a high salt diet triggered β-adrenergic-mediated suppression of renal WNK4 gene transcription and the development of salt-sensitive hypertension. They found the underlying molecular mechanism for this downregulation, which involved cyclic adenosine monophosphate-mediated modulation of histone acetylation in the promoter region of the WNK4 gene. The most advanced finding in the epigenetic determination of essential hypertension has been made in regards to miRNA modulated BP homeostasis. Endogenous miRNAs regulate gene expression through posttranscriptional or translational repression. The biogenesis of miRNAs involves Dicer, a RNase III endonuclease, which cleaves primary miRNA precursors to mature miRNA [22]. Smooth muscle-specific Dicer-knockout mice have SBP 27.7 mmHg lower than wild-type mice, which were accompanied by decreased vessel contractile function [23]. Smooth muscle-specific miRNA-145-knockout and miRNA-143/145-knockout mice also display reduced SBP by about 15–20 mmHg [24,25]. Conditional deletion of Dicer in the renin cell lineage results in decreased expression of the renin gene accompanied by hypotension [26]. These results suggest that miRNAs are essential for maintaining BP and contractile function in resistance vessels. Improved understanding of the dynamics of miRNA expression, the effect of miRNA on the expression of BP-regulating genes and interplay with genetic variation in miRNA-binding sites may elucidate part of the pathogenesis of essential hypertension. The heritability of hypertension (genetic hypertension) is typically estimated from family and twin studies to be in the range of 30–70% [27,28], with multiple contributory genes and gene–gene interactions. Essential hypertension occurs in all human populations; the genetic variation responsible for this disease should be preserved widely among diverse human populations, and the frequency of such variation should be relatively high. As mentioned above, currently patients with essential hypertension need lifelong treatment, which is largely empiric. Thus, determining which common variation might play an important role in the disease will lead to the generation of novel therapeutic targets. However, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) seeking to identify common genetic determinants for essential hypertension have not been fruitful. Four large GWAS groups [29–33] in the world did identify a total of more than 30 common loci associated with hypertension. Some of these loci contain genes previously known or suspected to be involved in BP regulation, and some loci exist among diverse human populations. All single nucleotide polymorphisms reached the threshold of genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10−8). However, their effect sizes were much smaller (about 1 mmHg) than anticipated and the collective effect of BP loci only explained a small fraction (about 1%) of BP heritability. Notwithstanding the fact that these common loci identified by GWAS for hypertension might be useful for some population-specific candidate gene studies and improve our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of essential hypertension, it is clear that no common gene variation contributed a substantial effect on hypertension, suggesting that the genetic architecture of BP regulation in the population is unlikely to be shaped by commonly occurring genetic variation in a diverse set of BP-influencing genes. This raises the more likely possibility that rare variants that are heterogeneous and uncommon may play a greater role in the phenotype of genetic hypertension. Pioneering work from Ji et al. [34] outlined the contours of the role that rare variants played in essential hypertension. They resequenced three genes (NCCT, NKCC2 and ROMK) involved in renal tubular salt reabsorption in the Framingham Heart Study population. They identified novel variations in these genes and defined the frequency of such rare variations in this population. These nonsynonymous loss-of-function variants were associated with lower BP and with SBP (lower by 5.7 mmHg at age 40 and by 9.0 mmHg at age 60) in the mutation-bearing group [34]. Similarly, Rao et al.[35] resequenced a locus critical for catecholamine storage, chromogranin A, and discovered a low (approximately 3%) frequency functional variant, Gly364Ser, that had a profound effect on autonomic activity as well as risk for HT. These studies clarify the possibility that the risk of hypertension in some fraction of the population can be strongly affected by functional rare variants. Although rare variants in a wide range of genes are likely to be the focus of hypertension genetics for the next decade, the detection of the sheer number of potentially culprit rare variants responsible for human essential hypertension will be a daunting task due to human genetic diversity and population-specific genetic variation, even though higher throughput next-generation human exome-wide and genome-wide sequencing will help to find some rare variants. Alternatively, specific hypertensive rat models represent good tools to uncover novel candidate genes and their genetic variations [36,37]. Once confirmed, these results could translate to human essential hypertension studies in some populations. The article by Chauvet et al.[38] in this issue of the Journal of Hypertension provides some promising clues to finding novel candidate hypertensive genes. This group previously isolated segments that harbor five BP quantitative trait loci (QTL) on rat chromosome 10 by congenic strains made from crosses of inbred hypertensive Dahl salt-sensitive and normotensive Lewis rats [39]. They have confirmed the individual QTL controlling quantitative variation in BP inherited in a monogenic trait [40]. In this study, they performed a systematic and comprehensive molecular analysis and revealed eight novel quantitative trait genes in four of the five QTL that carry nonconserved mutations. They confirmed that all these genes bear structural mutations and have transcriptional activities. These genes consist of the proline-rich 11 gene, benzodiazepine receptor-associated protein 1, Loc689764, myotubularin-related protein 4, protein phosphatase 1E, PP2C domain-containing, ring finger protein 43, Loc100363423 and the ATP-binding cassette, subfamily A, member 8a gene. They may be primary causal genes or signaling molecules involved in BP regulation. Most of their functions are unknown, but the work by Chauvet et al. is a critical step as a guide for isolating each gene to do further function testing by congenic fine resolution. Once the function associated with essential hypertension is confirmed by gene-knockin or gene-knockout approaches, these new genes could become signaling molecules in the essential hypertension polygenic network, which could be employed as targets for human essential hypertension association studies. In summary, although gene variants causing monogenic hypertension (less than 1% of essential hypertension) have been identified, and specific and effective treatment strategies have been developed, most therapy for essential hypertension is still empirically based. As no common gene variants contribute to a large effect size for this common disease, hunting for population or group-specific rare genetic variants responsible for about 50% of essential hypertension will be a daunting task. The rat models of genetic hypertension will be very helpful to find novel candidate causal genes and their variants. Progress in understanding the alteration of gene expression mediated by environmental factors leading to essential hypertension, and the role of epigenetics in essential hypertension, will promote elucidation of the pathogenesis of the other 50%. An equally important issue is to identify the common signaling pathway and its target genes activated by different causal factors, which trigger irreversible vascular remodeling and resetting resistance vessel tone in essential hypertension. Such breakthrough research in these two fields of essential hypertension will dramatically reduce the morbidity and mortality in coronary heart disease, stroke and renal failure caused by this silent killer in the next decade. Acknowledgement The study was supported by NIH grant HL096047. Conflicts of interest The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.