Why the study?
Visualizing and quantifying renal microcirculation in humans has been limited by a lack of non-invasive, non-nephrotoxic techniques, and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography had not been investigated in this setting.
Does contrast-enhanced ultrasonography reveal differences in renal cortical perfusion and flow reserve between hypertensive and normotensive participants?
Does contrast-enhanced ultrasonography reveal differences in renal cortical perfusion and flow reserve between hypertensive and normotensive participants?
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography demonstrates that hypertensive patients have lower basal renal cortical perfusion and impaired renal cortical flow reserve compared to normotensive individuals.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CEUS detects lower renal cortical perfusion in hypertension; leaves open its role in risk stratification or monitoring.
BACKGROUND: Microvascular structural alteration and dysfunction is a hallmark of arterial hypertension. So far, the visualization and the quantification of renal microcirculation in humans has been hampered by the lack of non-nephrotoxic and non-invasive radiologic techniques. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is an appealing method to investigate renal microcirculation and has not been investigated in this setting. We aimed to compare renal microcirculation in normotensive (NT) and hypertensive (HT) participants using CEUS at rest and during a sympathetic stress test. METHODS: We measured the renal perfusion index (PI, primary outcome), the renal resistive index (RRI), beat-to-beat systemic hemodynamics and plasma catecholamines before and during a 2-min cold pressor test (CPT) in NT and HT participants. Linear mixed model analysis was used to compare the effect of the CPT on the variables of interest. RESULTS: Seventy-three participants (32 HT) with normal kidney function were included. HT participants had a lower baseline PI compared with NT participants [median (interquartile range) 1476 (959-2155) arbitrary units (a.u.) vs 2062 (1438-3318) a.u., P < .001]. The CPT increased blood pressure, heart rate and catecholamines in all participants. The increase in PI observed in NT during the CPT was blunted in HT [+504 (117-920) a.u. vs +1159 (678-2352) a.u in NT, interaction P = .013]. Age, sex and body mass index did not modify these results. CONCLUSIONS: HT patients had a lower basal renal cortical perfusion. During the cold pressor test, HT participants had a smaller increase in the PI, suggesting that renal cortical flow reserve is impaired.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Damianaki et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: