Why the study?
RV function independently predicts prognosis in CHD, but RV adaptation to chronic pressure and/or volume overload is understudied.
Does the type of right ventricular overload affect right ventricular adaptation patterns assessed by pressure-volume loop analysis in patients with congenital heart disease?
Does the type of right ventricular overload affect right ventricular adaptation patterns assessed by pressure-volume loop analysis in patients with congenital heart disease?
Pressure-volume loop analysis can identify distinct right ventricular adaptation patterns to different types of overload in congenital heart disease that are not apparent on conventional imaging.
PV loop analysis reveals distinct RV adaptations by overload type in CHD despite similar conventional imaging; leaves open overload-specific therapy trials.
Background: Right ventricular (RV) function is an independent predictor of prognosis in congenital heart disease (CHD), but RV adaptation to chronic pressure and/or volume overload is understudied. This study aimed to assess adaptation to chronic RV pressure and/or volume overload in CHD patients using pressure-volume (PV) loop analysis. Methods: This retrospective study included CHD patients with a subpulmonary morphologic right ventricle and biventricular circulation who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging within 12 months prior to RHC at the University Medical Center Utrecht between August 2013 and November 2024. RV volumes, function, pressures and wall tension were obtained. RV afterload (arterial elastance [Ea]), contractility (end-systolic elastance [Ees]), RV-pulmonary artery (PA) coupling (Ees/Ea), and diastolic stiffness (end-diastolic elastance [Eed]) were evaluated using PV loop analysis. Results: = .010). RV-PA coupling, wall tension, and CMR-derived mass, function, and strain were similar across groups. Conclusions: Despite similar RV function on conventional imaging, PV analysis revealed distinct RV adaptation patterns for RV pressure and/or volume overload in CHD, suggesting potential for RV overload-specific treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joosen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: