Why the study?
Various hemodynamic changes occur after TAVI that may impact therapeutic decisions, prompting the use of noninvasive bioimpedance monitoring to evaluate short-term post-TAVI hemodynamics.
Does TAVI alter short-term hemodynamics as measured by noninvasive bioimpedance monitoring in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Does TAVI alter short-term hemodynamics as measured by noninvasive bioimpedance monitoring in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Noninvasive bioimpedance monitoring detects transient but significant hemodynamic changes immediately following TAVI, including increased blood pressure and peripheral resistance with decreased cardiac output, which normalize by 2 months.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NICaS may enable noninvasive post-TAVI monitoring; leaves open its clinical utility pending prospective validation.
Background Various hemodynamic changes occur following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) that may impact therapeutic decisions. NICaS is a noninvasive bioimpedance monitoring system aimed at hemodynamic assessment. We used the NICaS system in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) to evaluate short‐term hemodynamic changes after TAVI. Methods and Results We performed hemodynamic analysis using NICaS on 97 patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI using either self‐expandable (68%) or balloon‐expandable (32%) valves. Patients were more often women (54%) and had multiple comorbidities including hypertension (83%), coronary artery disease (46%), and diabetes (37%). NICaS was performed at several time points—before TAVI, soon after TAVI, at hospital discharge, and during follow‐up. Compared with baseline NICaS measurements, we observed a significant increase in systolic blood pressure and total peripheral resistance (systolic blood pressure 132±21 mm Hg at baseline versus 147±23 mm Hg after TAVI, P <0.001; total peripheral resistance 1751±512 versus 2084±762 dynes*s/cm 5 , respectively, P <0.001) concurrent with a decrease in cardiac output and stroke volume (cardiac output 4.2±1.5 versus 3.9±1.3 L/min, P =0.037; stroke volume 61.4±14.8 versus 56.2±15.9 mL, P =0.001) in the immediate post‐TAVI period. At follow‐up (median 59 days [interquartile range, 40.5–91]) these measurements returned to values that were not different from the baseline. A significant improvement in echocardiography‐based left ventricular ejection fraction was observed from baseline to follow‐up (55.6%±11.6% to 59.4%±9.4%, P <0.001). Conclusions Unique short‐term adaptive hemodynamic changes were observed using NICaS in patients with AS soon after TAVI. Noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation immediately following TAVI may contribute to the understanding of complex hemodynamic changes and merits favorable consideration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grinberg et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: