Why the study?
Does zero-fluoroscopy permanent pacemaker implantation using the Ensite NavX system provide a safe and feasible alternative to standard fluoroscopy guidance?
Population
26 patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation, including 6 patients in the zero-fluoroscopy group…
Comparison
Zero-fluoroscopy permanent pacemaker… vs Permanent pacemaker implantation performed under…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Longer zero-fluoroscopy dual-chamber times without complications; supports feasibility in select patients but leaves open randomized confirmation.
Does zero-fluoroscopy permanent pacemaker implantation using the Ensite NavX system provide a safe and feasible alternative to standard fluoroscopy guidance?
Zero-fluoroscopy permanent pacemaker implantation using the Ensite NavX system is a feasible and safe alternative for specific patients, such as pregnant women, despite longer procedural times for dual-chamber devices.
Guo et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: