Why the study?
Diabetes and hypertension mutually increase the risk for AF, warranting a prediction model for AF in this population.
What are the predictors of atrial fibrillation in hypertensive diabetic patients over 5 years?
What are the predictors of atrial fibrillation in hypertensive diabetic patients over 5 years?
A prediction model identified age, weight, CHA2DS2VASc score, and male gender as independent prognostic factors for AF in hypertensive diabetic patients, supporting risk-based screening.
May support risk-based AF screening in hypertensive diabetes; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical adoption.
(1) Background: The link between diabetes and hypertension is mutual and reciprocal, increasing the risks for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). The main objective was to develop a prediction model for AF in a population with both diabetes and hypertension at five years of follow-up. (2) Methods: A multicenter and community-based cohort study was undertaken of 8237 hypertensive diabetic patients without AF between 1 January 2103 and 31 December 2017. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to identify predictors AF and to stratify risk scores by quartiles. (3) Results: AF incidence was 10.5/1000 people/years (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.5–11.5), higher in men. The independent prognostic factors identified: age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.07 95% CI 1.05–1.09, p < 0.001), weight (HR 1.03 95% CI 1.02–1.04, p < 0.001), CHA2DS2VASc score (HR 1.57 95% CI 1.16–2.13, p = 0.003) and female gender (HR 0.55 95% CI 0.37–0.82, p = 0.004). Q4 (highest-risk group for AF) had the highest AF incidence, stroke and mortality, and the smallest number needed to screen to detect one case of AF. (4) Conclusions: Risk-based screening for AF should be used in high cardiovascular risk patients as the hypertensive diabetics, for treatment of modifiable cardiovascular risk, and monitoring AF detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Múria-Subirats et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: