Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Hypertension genetics remain too complex for routine clinical use; leaves open opportunities for integrative sequencing research.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Essential hypertension has long been considered to be primarily 'genetic,' though recent studies have only revealed minor contributions to blood pressure. Technology has advanced tremendously in the recent years, with much focus on DNA studies utilizing both candidate gene and genome-wide association studies. However, many new areas that need continued investigation have arisen. RECENT FINDINGS: In addition to DNA studies, genetic studies are actively pursuing previously unexplored areas of potential variation, such as that which occurs posttranscriptionally in RNA and posttranslationally in protein structure. Advances have also been made in animal models and systems biology for large-scale integrative approaches. However, many other areas need continued investigation in the genetics of hypertension, including improved phenotyping and trait definition, gene-by-gene interactions (epistasis), and gene-by-environment interactions. 'Next generation' sequencing will assist researchers in performing more extensive genetic studies even more quickly, especially on unusual (rare) genetic variants. SUMMARY: Hypertension appears to have many genetic contributions from each regulatory area ranging from DNA to RNA to protein to postprotein to interactive influences of the environment on genes. New technologies have enabled such research to advance in the recent years. However, for this complex trait of hypertension, continued efforts must progress in all of these areas as well as in increased modeling and sequencing, so that the knowledge may be united for a comprehensive understanding of this common disease, such that diagnosis and treatment options in hypertensive patients and those at risk are facilitated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fung et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: